Sub-4" barrel guns can be very picky. I couldn't get my Springfield Ultra Compact to work despite my gunsmith's best efforts and Dan Wesson couldn't fix my ECO 9. You may get lucky and the gun works fine. Also know that 45 ACP out of the SA Ultra Compact was extremely snappy; you may want to consider 9mm. But at that point, you can just get a S&W Shield Plus or SIG P365X and have a gun that's the same size for half the price. I have had a fantastic experience with my Nighthawk T4 (3.9" barrel) because it's been tuned.
My belief is that you're choosing a 1911 because you want the look, feel, and trigger of the 1911 platform. If that's the case, then my personal recommendation is to get a well built gun from a company like Wilson Combat or Nighthawk. This ensures that the gun has been built properly and has the company's service backing. A production gun from an average company is going to be built by "assemblers". The parts are slapped together, minor fitting is done as fast as possible, and out the door it goes.
Springfield did this with my EMP's and neither were functional out of the box. Kimber did this to me with a Tactical Ultra II and its replacement. Dan Wesson wasn't able to fix my ECO. Two EMP's, one Tac Ultra II, and the ECO cost me around $5,300 or so. I spent around $1200 trying to get that Kimber working (I tracked the receipts). That's over $6,000 in garbage guns because "I cannot afford a Nighthawk"! One amazing NHC would have cost less and at the time, I could have purchased two.
Go into this with open eyes and assume, on a production gun, you're going to spend at least the cost of the gun in shipping, parts, mags, ammo, range fees, gas, gunsmiths, etc. If you're willing to tinker, you may be able to do some of the work yourself and get it going.
But the last thing you want to do is buy the gun, clean it up, and take it to the range assuming it will work well. Then you'll get disappointed and join the legion of gun owners who think "I cannot trust this gun!!!!".