1911 Firearm Addicts banner

1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Christ is my front sight.
Joined
·
815 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Just came in to a used Kimber Classic Gold Match. Pistol appears to be in good shape, no real scratches etc. Of course it sports the plastic mainspring housing, and while some folks may be ok with that I personally don't care for them.

Anyway, I tore it down and was really disappointed in the condition of some of the parts. The trigger to frame fit was excessively sloppy, the hammer hooks were uneven and not square, the sear nose was not shaped properly (the primary and secondary angles were separated by a third very uneven angle), the ambi safety was bent away from the frame on the plunger tube side, the slide stop was not finished evenly on the round end, and it suffers from the dreaded barrel bump. Now I can fix most of all that but the gun was $995 used and retails new for close to $1300. Is this just the way it is nowadays? I guess it's a good thing really, keeps all the pistolsmiths in business. I was just disappointed. A little extra expense and it will all be fixed up. But really it's the same as Colt, you're paying for the name not the quality.
 

·
Dremel jockey
Joined
·
4,002 Posts
Lack of Quality is apparent in most everything I have bought over the last 30 years.
For most of the Buying Public, low cost trumps quality every time.
 

·
Every day is Saturday and every night's a party!
Joined
·
6,600 Posts
My Colts have been much better built than that.
 

·
I'm done buying guns, I'm just a bystander now
Joined
·
6,030 Posts
For most of the Buying Public, low cost trumps quality every time.
Yeah, well aside from this bunch a $1,000 for a 1911 or any gun is a small fortune and people buying Kimbers think they are "stepping up" not cheeping out... we are blessed
 

·
Dremel jockey
Joined
·
4,002 Posts
Send me pics and low dollar wants for your crap Kimbers.
I'm always in the challenge mode.
 

·
The Tinker
Joined
·
3,351 Posts
When I bought my one and only Kimber back at the turn of the century, I ran into similar issues. While it was a entry-level Kimber, I expected more (it did come with a steel MSH though), given the name.

So I threw away everything except the frame and slide, reworked those, and built my own gun. It has been quite the workhorse over the years, and I honestly cannot remember the last time it ever malfunctioned.

Of course being able to build/work on your own guns does make a difference as I do all of the periodic maintenance and tune-ups necessary to keep them in top condition.

I would have thought that Kimber quality would have gotten better by now. But then what do I know?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,138 Posts
To be fair, it’s a used gun and you don’t know what the prior owner did to it. Just some of this could have been operator induced. I guess I don’t know what the proper expectation should be for a $1,000 1911. The next questions are does it work, and does it pass all the safety tests?
Jeff
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,331 Posts
To be fair, it’s a used gun and you don’t know what the prior owner did to it. Just some of this could have been operator induced. I guess I don’t know what the proper expectation should be for a $1,000 1911. The next questions are does it work, and does it pass all the safety tests?
Jeff
Personally these days my expectations for a $1,000 1911 is a good slide & frame to be used as a base gun. If there are any, even one part that can be kept beyond that I’m pleasantly surprised.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
  • Like
Reactions: Longbow and FWoo45

·
Registered
Joined
·
568 Posts
I refuse to buy a new gun now, especially a Kimber.
I just wait for the right deal on a used Springfield, and then gut it, keeping just the barrel, frame, slide.

I think that after owning more than a few in the past, Kimber are way over priced.
 

·
Christ is my front sight.
Joined
·
815 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
It did pass safety tests etc. however I have no idea how it shoots. I usually get into working on them before I shoot them in most cases. At this point I've done some extensive improvements: 1)Squared the hammer hooks, 2)properly cut the sear angles, 3)tossed the plastic msh, mim thumb safety, and slide stop, 4)removed the loose barrel link and replaced it, 5)fixed the barrel bump, 6)discarded the poorly cast grip safety and fit a new one, 7)fit and adjusted the tension-less extractor, and filed the rear to be even with the slide, and 8)serrated the front strap. Also, 9)removed the trigger that had a sloppy vertical fit to the frame and fit a new one.

I'll let you know how it shoots when I get the new parts in a week or two and get them installed and get it all back together. :thumbs:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
381 Posts
As Denver asked, how does it shoot? You didn't even shoot it. I have a Kimber, plain black gun, less than 1000.00 brand new. Didn't work when new, went to premature slidelock about once every other magazine . I dimpled the slidelock and that corrected the problem After that the gun is very accurate and very reliable even with the plastic mainspring housing. I did replace the batwing safety with a small Colt safety. I also put in a Colt sear spring to bring the trigger down to 3-1/2#. I'd rather have a Colt gun but wanted to try the Kimber, it is tighter than any of my 3 Colts(by the way, the Goldcup and Combat Elite both have plastic mainspring housings). Accuracy is about the same for all 4 guns. The Colts and the Kimber are mass produced, assembly line guns. Move up a notch to Wilson or EB if you want all the pretty stuff but it will cost you.
 

·
Christ is my front sight.
Joined
·
815 Posts
Discussion Starter #14
Pistolpete,

Thank you for your response, sir. I think perhaps my original post is slightly misunderstood. I'm looking at this strictly from a gunsmithing perspective. I often don't shoot guns when I first acquire them especially if they are used. I tear them down, inspect the parts, overall condition, and general build quality. If I see items that need addressing I typically go right to it. Even if it shoots well in the current condition those things need to be addressed and corrected so prior to or after shooting is sort of irrelevant. I understand the point you are making entirely and appreciate your comments. My op was simply an observation from an amatuer pistolsmith who is still learning the ins and outs and whose focus is more the gunsmithing of the pistol rather than just getting one, shooting it and being happy with the quality.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,648 Posts
I'd rather have a Colt gun but wanted to try the Kimber, it is tighter than any of my 3 Colts.
They are built that way on purpose. Yes it is in the specification. Has nothing to do with the internet legions of knowing 1911 owners perception of "quality"... :)
 

·
The Tinker
Joined
·
3,351 Posts
Well then it does sound like Kimber quality has gotten better than it was 20 years ago.

But then I just might be one of those legions of knowing 1911 owners. :)
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top