1911 Firearm Addicts banner

OACP Ejection Port & Slide Rails.... causes for concern?

281 Views 3 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  DWPW
6
Hey all! My thanks in advance for any advice here....

So, I have this beautiful 1989 Colt MkiV OACP, which someone has already invested a great deal of time in with some lovely upgrades and top-shelf parts. I was originally going to try and sell this and use the funds towards a beautiful SA one of our respected members here had FS, but a death in the family and resulting disruptions to the business have forced me to put any purchases on hold, and instead focus on spit-polishing and upgrading this baby.

This gun locks up TIGHT and racking the slide feels very nice, however I have two causes for concern;

First is the ejection port (see pic #2). It looks a little rough to me, and maybe even like it was cut too far forward, and there's some rough patches on the barrel right aft of that spot, as if something abrasive is sneaking past that point somehow (see pic #3). Is this anything, or is it just my being nitpicky and paranoid?

Second is the frame rails (see pic #4). Again, this gun locks up tight, has no rattles at all and manipulating the slide feels nice and smooth.... but the tops of those rails looks like they've been chewed into something serious. Any thoughts on this?

This is my first worked-over Colt, I'm used to things like Guncrafter and Nighthawk, with DW Valors on the lower end..... But for some reason this Colt is just really something special to me. Very last question - I know the lower lip of the barrel is not supposed to meet the top of the feed ramp, there is supposed to be just a little bit of offset for the barrel sitting just a little ways back from the lip. Is there as acknowledged "spec" measurement for this offset, and if so, what is the measurement?

Thanks!!

Air gun Trigger Gun barrel Gun accessory Everyday carry

Table Wood Wood stain Hardwood Communication Device

Wood Trigger Gun barrel Thumb Air gun

Wood Trigger Fashion accessory Metal Gun accessory

Wood Finger Trigger Shotgun Air gun

Attachments

See less See more
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
1) No. Without that cut there, you would not be able to cleanly eject live rounds. You'll see this on short guns. If you don't see it, walk away from it as may choke if you try to eject a live round. This is largely a Colt thing but you'll see it occasionally on other makes too.

I would bet the rough patches were someone left their fingerprint there and never cleaned it/wiped it off, and it corroded slightly as a result. It looks like it's stainless steel, which can corrode...just not as quickly or readily.

2) No. It's fine. You have one of the shortest 1911s that can be made to function. The frame rails could be gravel; it would still be flinging back and forth so quickly that you'd never notice. Frankly you don't want a tight lockup or tight frame/slide fit on a 3-3.5" 1911; you want reliability and you'll never be shooting it for match points at a 50 yard line.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Very last question - I know the lower lip of the barrel is not supposed to meet the top of the feed ramp, there is supposed to be just a little bit of offset for the barrel sitting just a little ways back from the lip. Is there as acknowledged "spec" measurement for this offset, and if so, what is the measurement?
.032"
  • Like
Reactions: 2
1) No. Without that cut there, you would not be able to cleanly eject live rounds. You'll see this on short guns. If you don't see it, walk away from it as may choke if you try to eject a live round. This is largely a Colt thing but you'll see it occasionally on other makes too.

I would bet the rough patches were someone left their fingerprint there and never cleaned it/wiped it off, and it corroded slightly as a result. It looks like it's stainless steel, which can corrode...just not as quickly or readily.

2) No. It's fine. You have one of the shortest 1911s that can be made to function. The frame rails could be gravel; it would still be flinging back and forth so quickly that you'd never notice. Frankly you don't want a tight lockup or tight frame/slide fit on a 3-3.5" 1911; you want reliability and you'll never be shooting it for match points at a 50 yard line.
1) That makes perfect sense. I've seen Officer and Compact models both with and without this extra little cut.

2) This gun isn't new Les Baer tight, nothing like it, but it is a nice lockup and smooth rack, just how I want it. I will still probably have the frame rails looks at, if for nothing more than aesthetics, so long as it wont hurt reliability.

Thank you!
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top