Who made the slide?
I had a Springfield Armory pistol that was off. It required a bushing to center the firing pin hole.
I had a Springfield Armory pistol that was off. It required a bushing to center the firing pin hole.
It’s a Caspian.Who made the slide?
I had a Springfield Armory pistol that was off. It required a bushing to center the firing pin hole.
I read Caspian’s had higher than normal FP holes to offer more positive lockup (I don’t know if true). But I was planning to shoot for .050+ engagement regardless because this is a 10mm.I do a high lockup fitment on all my 1911/2011s, resulting in a fairly low primer strike. I have never had an issue with light primer strikes.
I have found Caspian firing pin holes to be undersized from their spec. I have had to “turn down” my firing pins.It’s a Caspian.
Wow, if that bushing center is where the original FP hole center was… that’s way off the mark.
I read Caspian’s had higher than normal FP holes to offer more positive lockup (I don’t know if true). But I was planning to shoot for .050+ engagement regardless because this is a 10mm.
I actually don’t care about how “centered” my strike is. This is my first build… I just want reliable and tight. My concern is a firing pin hole not parallel to the FP channel with a tight .068 EGW FP binding in the hole. I’d rather not undersize the firing pin to avoid binding because 10mm can/will have primer flow issues if the pin is too loose.
TBH I don't even measure this stuff on my own 10mm builds. I fit the barrel as high as I can and buy an oversized FP that requires fitting so I can get a snug fit in the FP hole. The last one, based on a JEM frame and slide, had a perfectly centered (according to the old Mk I eyeball) aligned FP hole and channel. IIRC there was a small burr on the inside of the slide's FP hole that I cleaned up with a small ball end mill.It’s a Caspian.
Wow, if that bushing center is where the original FP hole center was… that’s way off the mark.
I read Caspian’s had higher than normal FP holes to offer more positive lockup (I don’t know if true). But I was planning to shoot for .050+ engagement regardless because this is a 10mm.
I actually don’t care about how “centered” my strike is. This is my first build… I just want reliable and tight. My concern is a firing pin hole not parallel to the FP channel with a tight .068 EGW FP binding in the hole. I’d rather not undersize the firing pin to avoid binding because 10mm can/will have primer flow issues if the pin is too loose.
My Springfield slide with the off-center firing pin hole, was nearly impossible to get the pin in.Update: got my EGW .068 FP in and it has a healthy amount of “drag” in this slide. It drops in smooth until the pin gets to the small hole, then I have to wiggle it around a bit to find the hole. All my other 1911 firing pins drop right into their firing pin channels unrestricted (all the way) without a spring installed.
it’s not the diameter either; the FP hole gages exactly at .070 and the FP measures .068 and is dead straight. It’s got to be dragging in the off center/angled firing pin hole. I measured the friction/drag at about 13-14oz.
I think it will ignite primers just fine, but I’m worried about it retracting the FP fast enough. I measure the spring force of the FP springs in most of my 1911s to be 40-50oz, with essentially free-fitting firing pins. A pin with~13oz of drag is about 25-30% of the FP spring return force.