1911 Firearm Addicts banner
41 - 60 of 221 Posts
I grabbed one thru a distributor for a demo gun, because of the retro Colt M1911/M1911A1-ish vibes with the subtle modern enhancements. I dig the fact that the slide closely matches my WWI Colt 1918 M1911 (aside from the original factory ball cuts), but I too, was a bit confused by the pairing of an M1911A1 style frame.

Initial Impressions:

Pros:

All together, it is a visually stunning retro package. A journey back to 2 different times, with just the right amount of subtle modern upgrades. Absolutely beautiful-if you're taking pics for IG clout.

The bluing is immaculate.

Nods to to the WWI reproduction thumb safety and slide stop.

Great 20 LPI front strap checkering and the trigger guard undercut is a nice, contemporary upgrade.

I'm digging the classic brass F. bead sight.

Beveled magwell is a nice touch.

Cons:

The Beaver tail grip safety is complete MIM garbage, with an extra chromosome on the memory groove/bump. While functional, it is truly ugly AF. I hate it.That being said, mine was "blended"/fit decently.

Trigger: Short trigger. While it meshes up with the M1911A1 style frame, the take up on my example is decently clean, but then you hit a wall, then it hits a burr, skips to another wall, mush-grit, then bang. Meh. Tolerable, but I've been spoiled with much better guns. Breaks at about 4- 4 1/2 lbs.

Slide to frame fit is lack luster on my example. It's a rattle trap, reminiscent of the most clapped out CMP USGI M1911A1 rebuilds. I have original WWI/WWII USGI guns that are tighter than this. Then again, most Colt production offerings are not known for one piece, rattle-free, tightness.

Barrel to slide/frame fit is marginal, with plenty of movement within the barrel hood and bushing. One wonders why Colt would skimp on fitting, while including a National Match barrel in the package.

Slide stop: While it's a decent WWI reproduction, on my example- I've never had more trouble reinstalling a slide stop on any 1911 as I have on this particular gun. It effing' sucked. the plunger detent is most likely out of spec and will definitely require some polishing and the slide stop will definitely benefit from a relief cut.

Mainspring housing: I agree with OP. Why does it not match the 20 LPI FS checkering? A lanyard loop would have been real cool to set off the retro vibe, but not absolutely necessary.

"Limited Edition" laser engraving on the slide. Meh. Not a deal killer, but would have just preferred it to be left blank, or have "Model of 1911 U.S. Army" since Colt decided to go WWI with the slide assy'. "Colt's Government Model" would have sufficed as well.

Magazine: Not a big gripe, but 1 stainless Colt 8 rounder? That decision seemed to be random AF. This will be fed exclusively thru Wilson 47 and 47Ds.

Conclusion:

I wasn't planning to send this guy out, but this example will most likely go out to Novak, Wilson or NH to get a few necessary mods done to it. Certainly not a perfect gun, but a great starting point for a custom, retro style 1911 pistol.
 
Mine showed up today, I haven't taken it apart, initial impressions:
-Slide to frame fit is loose, it's not horrific, but it is not great. It's "tolerable." It doesn't rattle when you shake it.
-The BTGS is terrible, horrific. The fit is bad and it does rattle, I mean it REALLY rattles.
-The trigger (part), terrible. Loose vertically and horizontally, sloppy. Rattles almost as badly as the BTGS. I could play in a band with this pistol.
-Thumb safety, poor fit. Drags when engaging, when disengaged you can push it down further and then it will spring up. I hate that, pet peeve.
-The trigger is serrated, I don't know why because you can't feel them on mine. This is fine, because I don't like serrated triggers. It just feels like a bead blasted trigger.
-Slide release, may as well not be serrated, no purchase what so ever. Wore down (during mfg?) at the forward edge. They aren't even pointy, they are cosmetic.
-You can see the punch mark from the rear sight install, no biggie, I'm actually amazed they used a brass punch.
-I didn't expect it to be be "dehorned" and for the most part the pistol isn't offensive, but the edge in the area around the front strap/undercut/mag button is sharp as hell.
-I think the trigger is about 8lbs, maybe not 8, but it feels like it. Has forceful reset though 😁. The slop and take up is impressive.
-The feed ramp is rough. I didn't figure they would polish it, but wow.
-The MSH is plastic, seriously!
-I have to slam a magazine into the magwell to get it to lock, CMC Power mags won't drop free.

That said, the checkering is nice, the dovetails aren't screwed up, the bluing is nice save for a couple of boo boos. I'm glad I didn't pay retail, I would be really mad if I paid over retail. I'm scared to look inside. I think they actually took a box of parts and just stuck them together and called it a day.

I was going to replace some parts myself, but I think given the cost of the pistol, this is going to a gunsmith. I don't want to "first time I installed..." on this pistol.

I should call Colt's customer service and see what they say. 😂

BTW: The "Limited Edition" on the slide actually doesn't look that tacky.

I'll add, the barrel fit isn't bad at all, it's pretty good, obviously the bushing could have a better fit. There is a ding/pit on the side of one of my lugs, very small.
The trigger, once you get past the slop, the take up, and the fact that it is heavy, is actually not bad either. I mean, the pull isn't rough, it's fairly smooth.
 
It's not quite that simple, first you have to know what radius the tangs are and find a corresponding radius grip safety. If it's like a Springfield Loaded frame it's a somewhat proprietary cut. If you have ever put a grip safety from a mil spec to a beavertail you know it's alot of work. The Colt Competition and Wiley Clapps much better fit from the jump. If I'm spending 1300-1400 dollars on a gun quality should reflect that. I'm a dyed in the wool American made 1911 government fan, however I don't know why Colt would get a pass on this when everyother manufacturer is able to do it, even the turkish guns. Its a shame a company like Colt went Belly up, but stuff like this is maybe an indication of why, truly sad.
Took them 30 years to incorporate things we were arguing with them about in 1980
I don't joke, we had meetings with then in 1890 and IPSC improvements on basic Govt models. Meanwhile the industry went right past them. COLT commercial management has been screwy for decades.
 
Well, I finally got ahold of Colt's newest release in the 1911 space, the Colt's Model 01911SE-A1. As a card-carrying member of the Colt's Fanboi Club, it was a "must have", especially after seeing that this new model sports a ring hammer. For some general information, this pistol is a standard Government Model length, GI recoil system, single-stack, .45 ACP. The gun comes with one (bummer) Colt-marked magazine.

Now, aesthetically, I think Colt absolutely knocked this gun out of the park. With the exception of the Novak rear (personal choice/opinion), I really can't think of anything I would change about the SE's immediate looks. As far as function goes, I can't make that determination yet, as I just picked up the gun and haven't shot it yet.

Here are some of my initial highlights of the gun:

Overall Aesthetic
The SE is an insanely good-looking gun, because it follows the classic look that is universally loved. It's a five-inch, blued, .45 ACP pistol, a formula that not only won two World Wars- but our hearts as well (I know Gov't issued WW2 guns were largely parkerized, don't ruin the moment). However, the general look of the gun is only the beginning. I was really impressed by Colt's decision to use an original-style nub thumb safety with "checkering" on the top AND bottom like the pre-war guns (The thumb safety is actually very nice. Crisp and audible movements. Great job!). You'll also notice this early-style checkering mimicked on the slide stop as well. Of course, the left side of the slide depicts the roll marks that were first seen on Colt 1911/Government Models in 1918, an excellent choice for this retro-inspired build. When I first saw this, I was puzzled at the use of these roll marks with a scalloped frame and short trigger, however, I believe early transitional model pistols also sported these markings with a scalloped frame and short trigger (call it 1918-1924 for this style of roll mark).

Interesting Details
On the frame of the SE, you'll notice a slight undercut as well as 25LPI checkering that actually feels really good, even with my fondness for 15/17/20LPI checkering. I was delighted to see the undercut on this gun, and really feel that this shows someone at Colt is listening to shooters. Moving from the frame to the slide, the SE sports a brass bead front sight (very nice) and a Novak blacked-out rear sight. Personally, the Novak sight isn't for me, as I have become a whore for a ledge rear sight, but to each his own, or something like that. Then folks... then we get to the cherry on top, the pizza de risitance (or whatever them Frenchies say), the freakin' ring hammer. Holy crap- seeing Colt put out a blued, five-inch .45 ACP with a ring hammer plum gave me a tingle in the dingle. It's the epitome of cool, the 4in white walls to a 50's Caddy, the last piece of the puzzle, the perfect setting on the thermostat so that you're cool enough to be comfortable but don't have to have on a blanket. A ring hammer is just... it. To quote Ken Hackathorn when we were chatting about the gun yesterday, "They were really speakin' to ya with that ring hammer, weren't they?". It's a phenomenal look, one that I tend to replicate on most of my semi-custom builds, and just like with those guns, the ring hammer looks fantastic on this gun.

Yes, But...
While the Colt SE is an overall big win, there are some things that even this old (wait, I'm 25)- young- Colt lover isn't a fan of. For starters, the fit of the gun is... okay. I think this is coming more from me being spoiled with hot-rodded guns and semi-customs, however, compared to Colts made post (and during)-World War Two, it's pretty top-notch. I think people tend to forget the scale of production that Colt is doing, and while I am certainly not here to make excuses, it is also important to know where you came from and keep that quality in perspective. With that same note, I do think that the grip safety could have been a.) made better b.) fit better. I get that these are, virtually just assembled handguns, but man, they (Colt) can produce a better-looking grip safety than this. It's really the only major point of somewhat disappointment with the gun. That, and the mainspring housing sports vertical lines on the back, not 25LPI checkering to match the front strap. The trigger isn't fantastic (again, spoiled from semi-customs), but it IS a Series 70 trigger which is a big win. My Colt Custom Shop Custom Carry has a Series 80, so I am really happy to see that this gun was able to get the Series 70 ignition system.

Interesting fact: Due to lawsuits, Colt currently has a policy where marketed "carry guns" are Series 80, while "collectible/competition guns" remain Series 70.

I think all-in-all, this is a big win for CZ-era Colt. It shows that they're willing, ready, and able to continue the Colt legacy and give 1911 shooters the pistols we want. It's a great gun for those who want a "classic" Colt with some modern fighting-gun features and of course- it'll make a RAD base pistol for a build.

My plans for this new .45 ACP? I would never send this off to be customized! Just kidding, yall know me better than that. I'd like to send this gun to Novak to get one of their packages with The Answer backstrap. I've been obsessed with The Answer for some time, and I think this pistola would look gorgeous with the Novak logo on it! Or, maybe sweet talk KGB into recreating his latest comp'd gun (even though .45 ACP comped is sort of lame).

View attachment 1379251
View attachment 1379252
Eli, that is sweet indeed. I have one on layaway that I will have in my hands next month. Hilton got one and I was convinced to do the same. That retro thumb safety is cool and all but its gotta go for a modern WC or EGW. Rear sight will be 100% a 10-8 Performance U notch and a 10-8P flat trigger as well. Hammer will stay but new egw fire control parts for a reliability package and trigger job. Some 10-8P VZ grips and a Stan Chen SI magwell to round it out.
 
I thought that too, but there aren't any low priced guns with the nice blue aesthetic, or the checkering on the front strap. The Novak sight cuts, beavertail cut, etc. Plenty of really ugly guns out there with these features, but this one aint ugly.
I was able to pick the best out of four at my local dealer, and it was significantly better than the other three.
 
I thought that too, but there aren't any low priced guns with the nice blue aesthetic, or the checkering on the front strap. The Novak sight cuts, beavertail cut, etc. Plenty of really ugly guns out there with these features, but this one aint ugly.
I was able to pick the best out of four at my local dealer, and it was significantly better than the other three.
Good point, I forgot about the checking, which is nice, but only on the frontstrap, the rest of the checking is garbage.

The bevertail is not a selling point, it is an embarrassment on mine, as is the trigger fit. With modern manufacturing, there is no excuse, and better sights aren't an "option" anymore, this isn't the 70's and A/C in a car. I didn't expect custom, but damn. 😂

No, it isn't ugly by a long shot, it looks great, but so do a lot of strippers and they require less help than this pistol.
 
In all honesty, for what needs to be replaced, this pistol should be priced $400-$500* lower considering the quality of the assembly.

*Depending on what you paid for it. I've seen some high asking prices out there.
The base gun, upgraded feature set, especially novak sights, beavertail and 25 lpi fs checkering, make it well worth the price, it is a Colt, made in the USA, not inferior metallurgy from Turkey of the Phillipines.
 
My new Gold Cup (from this year) had a plastic MSH, but this pistol had a serrated metal one. (I checkered it to match). My Series 70 Govt from 2022 had a plastic MSH also.
 
Right? Honestly, it's the worst BTGS I've ever seen on any 1911.

Wait, Wat? you received a plastic MSH on yours? Mine's definitely metal.
It's metal, I'm a bonehead. lol. It finish is a bit different and upon first glance. So, what is everyone, or anyone, replacing the BTGS with? I was thinking the Harrison 240.

*I called Colt, their grip safeties a loose, have a good one. 😁 I actually got all excited because they were going to send me a shipping slip, but he thought I said thumb safety. Damn Southern accent. 😂
 
It's metal, I'm a bonehead. lol. It finish is a bit different and upon first glance. So, what is everyone, or anyone, replacing the BTGS with? I was thinking the Harrison 240.
Because I was already planning to cut the heck out of the frame for a high grip, I went with an Ed Brown gunsmith fit. Does a nice job of filling up the gap between the tangs. FWIW, mine were cut just a smidge under 0.25" radius.
Image
 
Discussion starter · #57 ·
Because I was already planning to cut the heck out of the frame for a high grip, I went with an Ed Brown gunsmith fit. Does a nice job of filling up the gap between the tangs. FWIW, mine were cut just a smidge under 0.25" radius. View attachment 1384219
That looks really good!
 
Because I was already planning to cut the heck out of the frame for a high grip, I went with an Ed Brown gunsmith fit. Does a nice job of filling up the gap between the tangs. FWIW, mine were cut just a smidge under 0.25" radius. View attachment 1384219
That looks fantastic, great job. Thank you for the info. I was planning to replace parts anyway, but I'll need to brush up on how to do a BTGS, gotta learn some time. I bent the leaf spring finger out, the BTGS isn't flopping all over the place as badly now. Should have thought of that. This will buy me time until I can get Sally Struthers to send me the gun smithing pamphlet.

The sear is truly fantastic though:
Image

I'm not even mad, this has been such a stressful week that this is pleasantly amusing.
 
Because I was already planning to cut the heck out of the frame for a high grip, I went with an Ed Brown gunsmith fit. Does a nice job of filling up the gap between the tangs. FWIW, mine were cut just a smidge under 0.25" radius. View attachment 1384219
That exudes class, sir! Well done.
 
41 - 60 of 221 Posts