1911 Firearm Addicts banner

Dan Wesson Guardian 9mm vs 45 ACP

6.9K views 29 replies 24 participants last post by  Dwvalor  
#1 ·
Hello all,

I have read a few different posts and perhaps might be confusing my own self about this topic of 9mm vs 45 ACP.
But in general, I have heard that 9mm isn't naturally as reliable as 45 ACP without modifications in several aspects to the original 1911 design.

Are there specific manufacturers that take this into account?

I thought Dan Wesson would be one that had, but posts on the Guardian 9mm unreliability have me questioning what actually are the good 9mm manufacturers.

Or is there always some degree of unreliability even in say a perfectly tuned, full custom Wilson Combat? Simply because 9mm is 9mm and physics is decent hurdle to 'perfectly' overcome in adapting the platform? Then again one could also equally find a tale or two of common 45ACPs that jam up since they weren't originally designed to feed hollow points either, so the designs had to be adapted to allow for common self-defense ammunitions.

Ideally, I'd like to get the Dan Wesson Guardian, but I can't confidently say that anymore after browsing around what people have had to say about it without getting further information from anyone who may be willing to share it.
 
#25 ·
I bought a new DW Guardian in 38super about a month ago. First time taking it out to shoot with factory ammo, it would not go into battery, fully every couple shots. I started reading the forums to find out why it was doing this. I saw "Dub's" post on his experience and what he did. I checked the extractor tension, and it was way too tight. I removed it, de-tensioned it, and it ran fine after that. But I, like Dub, ordered a Wilson extractor because the original DW one looked, like Dub said, not that robust. I put the Wilson in and haven't had a problem since. This pistol is so nice.
 
#21 ·
I have a Guardian. .38 Super.

It is one I bought new two years ago (has the checkered mainspring housing).

It was a single shot jam master when it arrived. First range session was terrible. Jammed every shot.

Home, field stripped and pulled the extractor and adjusted it.
It ran okay on next session, however, the extractor had concerned me as it wasn't very robust.

I'd ordered a new WC extractor and replaced the DW part. Never had another problem or another concern.


This same exact experience was had on my DW Razorback, too. Also a new gun.


Not sure what DW methods are for extractor set up, but both those guns were terrible as delivered.


I'd rather have extractor issues than something more unsettling. Easy fixes vs not easy.
I'd rather, however, have Dan Wesson get things right the first time.....like they once did.

I digress......that Guardian, is a great gun. It is my carry piece today.
 
#20 · (Edited)
Welcome to the forum!
As another member pointed out a lemon will always show up from time to time. I have a SA Garrison 9mm that had to go back to Springfield for several issues. Its now fixed and runs great!
As far as DW goes I only own one and its a 9mm Guardian… I can’t praise the gun enough. There’s been no reliability issues or malfunctions of any kind out of it. I say go for it ! Just pick your flavor. I will point out however the recoil is definitely milder with the 9mm considering its aluminum frame .
Image
 
#18 · (Edited)
Hello all,

I have read a few different posts and perhaps might be confusing my own self about this topic of 9mm vs 45 ACP.
But in general, I have heard that 9mm isn't naturally as reliable as 45 ACP without modifications in several aspects to the original 1911 design.

Are there specific manufacturers that take this into account?

I thought Dan Wesson would be one that had, but posts on the Guardian 9mm unreliability have me questioning what actually are the good 9mm manufacturers.

Or is there always some degree of unreliability even in say a perfectly tuned, full custom Wilson Combat? Simply because 9mm is 9mm and physics is decent hurdle to 'perfectly' overcome in adapting the platform? Then again one could also equally find a tale or two of common 45ACPs that jam up since they weren't originally designed to feed hollow points either, so the designs had to be adapted to allow for common self-defense ammunitions.

Ideally, I'd like to get the Dan Wesson Guardian, but I can't confidently say that anymore after browsing around what people have had to say about it without getting further information from anyone who may be willing to share it.
Aw Grasshopper, buy that DW Guardian of your heart's desire in 9mm and go live in peace. ;)
 
#16 ·
Thank you all for posting all your positive experiences with the Dan Wesson brand, since I don't often purchase new firearms, it is easy to end up tying myself up on concerns.
I will think about whether I want to go with the Guardian or save a little more and see about the semi-custom productions, but I feel a lot more confident now if that is the route I go.
And also thank you very much for the warm welcome to the forum, I appreciate it a lot!
 
#13 ·
I've got six 9mm 1911/2011's. Four commanders and two governments.
The platform is sensitive to magazine choice and ammo selection. Once you figure out what each individual gun likes, there really are no problems.
The shorter barrels, under 4.25" are more finicky, that's why I've stayed with the longer guns.
DW is an excellent gun with quality parts and very good machining. My DW PM9 actually has tighter slide/frame fit than one of my Wilson's.
 
#5 ·
I own a Guardian, a Valor, and a Vigil (all CDR-size Dan wesson 9mm 1911's). Never had a gun-induced issue with any of them. JHP, FMJ - if the ammo is right (i.e., not reloads with a "Glock bulge") they shoot. Until I went to a Wilson EDC X9, the Vigil was my daily carry.

OH - and I also PM'd the original poster.
 
#4 ·
It is a good point that there may always be a place where a lemon or two pop up, and as I went looking for the post I had read, I couldn't find it and instead just saw a bunch of positive ones. Tried to google search and only a reddit post came up, which I haven't really put stock in compared to when I search on forums like this one.

I suppose my only direct follow-up question is, in terms of lemons and vetting of any 1911, is there more testing of it done in the factory for say Ed Brown or Wilson Combat to avoid those lemons? Or are the end products pretty much vetted all the same once you get to Dan Wesson or higher tier?
 
#15 ·
It is a good point that there may always be a place where a lemon or two pop up, and as I went looking for the post I had read, I couldn't find it and instead just saw a bunch of positive ones. Tried to google search and only a reddit post came up, which I haven't really put stock in compared to when I search on forums like this one.

I suppose my only direct follow-up question is, in terms of lemons and vetting of any 1911, is there more testing of it done in the factory for say Ed Brown or Wilson Combat to avoid those lemons? Or are the end products pretty much vetted all the same once you get to Dan Wesson or higher tier?
I wouldn't expect much in the way of "vetting" by DW (CZ), they make too many guns to spend time running a bunch of rounds through them all. DW may be pricing their products like they're a high-end manufacturer but do not mistake them for an Ed Brown or Wilson type "semi-custom" 1911 house, they're production line guns and certainly do not get the attention that higher end manufacturers give theirs. That said, they're well made, popular guns that have an excellent reputation, I wouldn't let fear of getting a lemon stop me from buying one.
 
#3 ·
Hello all,

I have read a few different posts and perhaps might be confusing my own self about this topic of 9mm vs 45 ACP.
But in general, I have heard that 9mm isn't naturally as reliable as 45 ACP without modifications in several aspects to the original 1911 design.

Are there specific manufacturers that take this into account?

I thought Dan Wesson would be one that had, but posts on the Guardian 9mm unreliability have me questioning what actually are the good 9mm manufacturers.

Or is there always some degree of unreliability even in say a perfectly tuned, full custom Wilson Combat? Simply because 9mm is 9mm and physics is decent hurdle to 'perfectly' overcome in adapting the platform? Then again one could also equally find a tale or two of common 45ACPs that jam up since they weren't originally designed to feed hollow points either, so the designs had to be adapted to allow for common self-defense ammunitions.

Ideally, I'd like to get the Dan Wesson Guardian, but I can't confidently say that anymore after browsing around what people have had to say about it without getting further information from anyone who may be willing to share it.
I owned 2. The only reason it's 2 and not 1 is because I was an idiot and sold the first one. It's one of my favorite 1911 9mm's to shoot.

There's always going to be someone somewhere with an issue. Just buy it and enjoy it. If you happen to have issues then diagnose and fix otherwise you're worrying about a tomorrow problem that may never exist. Both of my ran perfectly without any modifications.