1911 Firearm Addicts banner
21 - 40 of 42 Posts
Though I knew about gold bead sights, I'd never tried one. That is until I acquired my NHC Classic commander last year. It showed me the gold bead front works great for me. I'm in the process of swapping out the night sights on a few of my 1911's, to gold bead.

I agree that the night sights with colored rings show up better. They are also wider that I prefer.

And yes, gold bead front sights look great, too! :cool:
 
This will be nothing new to you veterans, but on your brass beads , use good old brasso to easily shine it up and put a touch of clear nail polish on the polished dome. Lasts a good long time, cheap and easy to do.

Not a replacement for a gold bead , but have you priced gold lately?
 
I would mail you 50 of them, but the cost of sending them is more than they cost to go buy yourself.
Gold wire would work too, and you could just hit the sight with a torch and press the gold into the hole and it would melt right in. Would arguably be a much better fit, but would not be easy to dome like mine.
 
I have had brass bead front sights, gold bead front sights, and varying black or tritium sights.

The best and fastest one for carry or duty guns to me is the Ameriglo or Trijicon tritium front sight with a big orange polymer ring around it. Easy to pick up in any light and the front sight just stands out so sharply. Not as fragile as the plain fiber-optic sights, and much brighter than gold or brass beads.

However, gold or brass bead sights never need to be replaced, so I like to have a gold bead front sight on the pistols I mainly have for collector pieces. Currently that is only one pistol, though, but if I ever ordered another custom build, I'd probably go for a gold bead.

I will say that gold and brass do not seem equal to me. Brass tarnishes and gets dull faster and doesn't seem as bright even when clean. Gold seems brighter and polishes nicely. If it's a domed bead, I find that better as well, as a flat one mainly reflects light straight back and is most reflective from a perfect sight picture, while a domed and polished bead, for me anyway, is picked up more readily from imperfect sight pictures.
 
I would mail you 50 of them, but the cost of sending them is more than they cost to go buy yourself.
Gold wire would work too, and you could just hit the sight with a torch and press the gold into the hole and it would melt right in. Would arguably be a much better fit, but would not be easy to dome like mine.
😂 Now Rose Gold Or Cubic Zirconia.....Don't forget 🧡 shaped. 😂😂😂 i suppose you triggered my inner Cheap... Didn't Bill Wilson start in the back of Jewelry Store?
 
I have had brass bead front sights, gold bead front sights, and varying black or tritium sights.

The best and fastest one for carry or duty guns to me is the Ameriglo or Trijicon tritium front sight with a big orange polymer ring around it. Easy to pick up in any light and the front sight just stands out so sharply. Not as fragile as the plain fiber-optic sights, and much brighter than gold or brass beads.

However, gold or brass bead sights never need to be replaced, so I like to have a gold bead front sight on the pistols I mainly have for collector pieces. Currently that is only one pistol, though, but if I ever ordered another custom build, I'd probably go for a gold bead.

I will say that gold and brass do not seem equal to me. Brass tarnishes and gets dull faster and doesn't seem as bright even when clean. Gold seems brighter and polishes nicely. If it's a domed bead, I find that better as well, as a flat one mainly reflects light straight back and is most reflective from a perfect sight picture, while a domed and polished bead, for me anyway, is picked up more readily from imperfect sight pictures.
Dude, have you tried the Amerglo Lumi-Green? Seriously, give it a shot, it is sorcery. I've had the red/orange black out on me*, the Lumi-green is amazing.

*I need reading glasses, so I have to have a FS that really stands out if I'm not wearing them.
 
Brass can and will tarnish...GOLD never does. I love the look of it, and the functionality during daylight hours. Hence the gold bead on my competition Wilson. But for a serious defense pistol, like my EDC Ed Brown Kobra Carry, I like an HD tritium front sight. Fiber optics are, in my opinion, ugly and fragile. :ROFLMAO:
 
I think that gold is used as much or more for it being a precious material as it is for functionality. I'm sure the color difference between a light yellow brass and gold isn't going to be that great. But the brass just doesn't have the prestige or status that gold does. I think this is along the same logic of using mammoth for grips. For me personally, I can't see any logic in using that material. In most cases, a nice figured piece of wood looks much better than any piece of mammoth. But that's not the point of using mammoth. It's because it's supposed to be rare and therefore expensive. It's more of a status thing than a functional thing. For that matter, I'd never have a set of polished mammoth or wood grips. A grip is called a grip for a reason. It's supposed to help you hold and maintain a grip on the pistol. Checkering or stippling helps you do that so much better. But this is also why polished grips tend to be on barbecue guns or mantle pieces rather than functional firearms.
I disagree on the brass/gold thing. Having had both, I can tell you it's more than just the "precious metal" thing. Brass tends to tarnish and lose its luster - gold never does.
 
21 - 40 of 42 Posts